Lawsuit accuses Bowman, Fed of 'rigging' comment process

This lawsuit targets the Federal Reserve over how it handles feedback on major banking regulations, specifically the 'Basel III endgame' rules. A consumer advocacy group claims Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman held private meetings to coach big banks on how to effectively oppose stricter capital requirements. For a retailer or service provider, this might seem like high-level bank drama, but the outcome directly affects your ability to offer consumer credit. If these capital rules are finalized as originally proposed, big banks will be required to hold significantly more cash in reserve. When banks have to tuck more money away, they often tighten their lending standards to mitigate risk. This means your customers might face higher rejection rates for credit cards or store-branded financing. It could also lead to higher interest rates for the financing plans you offer. The lawsuit claims the Fed allowed 'undue influence' from the banking lobby to soften these rules. If the rules are indeed softened or delayed due to this legal pressure, it might keep the flow of consumer credit more accessible for your shoppers in the short term. However, it also highlights the intense political and legal volatility currently surrounding the rules that govern how your lending partners operate.

Source: American Banker — Top News

← Return to the library· Submit a correction